Interprofessional Trauma Team Training: Leveraging Each Specialties' Expertise to Teach Procedural-Based Skills.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to utilize interprofessional trauma team training to teach procedural-based skills, teamwork, and assess the impact on the procedural comfort and interprofessional collaboration. DESIGN: Interdisciplinary skills sessions were created to focus on chest tube placement and advanced ultrasound techniques. Chest tube sessions were taught by senior general surgery (GS) residents and faculty. Ultrasound sessions were taught by emergency medicine (EM) fellows and faculty. Mock trauma simulations for EM and GS residents and EM nurses, were developed to also focus on improving interprofessional trauma-bay collaboration. Sessions were held throughout the year for 2 consecutive academic years. After completing skills sessions and trauma scenarios, participants were surveyed on skill comfort, session utility, and willingness to collaborate with the other specialty. Likert scale responses were analyzed by specialty cohort and in aggregate. Free-text feedback responses were analyzed for common themes. SETTING: Large, tertiary, urban academic medical center PARTICIPANTS: Forty seven EM residents and 32 GS residents completed instructional chest tube and ultrasound simulations, respectively. Twenty two EM residents, 24 GS residents, and 29 EM nurses participated in interprofessional trauma simulations. RESULTS: For chest tube placement: 71% of EM residents reported feeling uncomfortable with the procedure prior to the session, with 100% reporting improved confidence afterwards. Seventy percent stated the model was realistic. One hundred percent thought it improved their procedural skills. All participants thought it was worthwhile, should be offered again in future years, and planned to incorporate what they learned in their future practice. For the ultrasound sessions: 61% of GS residents felt uncomfortable with the Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma prior to the simulation. Ninety four percent reported the improved skill and confidence, and felt the model was realistic. All participants felt sessions were worthwhile, should be offered again, and planned to incorporate what they learned in their future practice. For trauma simulations: 97% of participants felt scenarios were realistic and clinically relevant and planned to incorporate lessons learned in their future clinical practice. All participants thought participation was worthwhile. Ninety seven percent thought it improved their confidence with trauma clinical management and 56% reported it improved their skills. Many participants reported they appreciated learning from the other specialty's perspective, with greater than 95% of all participants reporting improved comfort and willingness to collaborate across disciplines when caring for future trauma patients. All participants requested the simulation sessions continue in future academic years. CONCLUSION: Interprofessional trauma simulation sessions can harness the unique skill sets of different disciplines to teach procedural-based skills and improve interprofessional collaboration within the trauma bay.

Simulation versus reality: what can interprofessional simulation teach us about team dynamics in the trauma bay?

Purpose: Surgical consultation and the joint management of trauma patients is a common scenario in the emergency department. The goal of this study was to utilize interprofessional trauma team training to understand the role of simulation and its impact on the overall culture of trauma-related care. Methods: Interdisciplinary trauma simulation scenarios were completed by 12 groups of emergency medicine residents, general surgery residents, and emergency medicine nurses across two academic years. Following each simulation, a debriefing session was held to reflect on the scenario, focusing on team interactions. Debriefing sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed, deidentified, and independently, inductively coded by two members of the research team. Using the constant comparative method, a codebook was developed and refined until interrater reliability was confirmed with a kappa of > 0.9. Codes were organized into higher level themes. Results: There were 72 participants, including 23 general surgery residents, 19 emergency medicine residents, and 30 emergency medicine nurses. 214 primary codes were collapsed into 29 coding categories, with 6 emerging themes. Pre-trauma bay impact describes how interactions prior to the trauma scenario can impact how team members communicate, trust one another, and ultimately care for the patient. Role and team identity explores the importance of one knowing their individual role in the trauma bay and how it impacts overall team identity. Resource allocation describes the balance of having appropriate resources to efficiently care for patients while not negatively impacting crowd control or role identity. Impact of the simulation experience highlights the impact of the lower stakes simulation scenario on learning and reflection as well as concerns with simulation fidelity. Trauma leader traits and actions outlines inherent traits and learned actions of trauma leaders that impact how the trauma scenario unfolds. Interprofessional team performance describes the overall performance of the trauma team, including but not limited to the type of communication used, teamwork behaviors, and transition of care of the patient. Conclusions: Interdisciplinary trauma simulations and structured debriefing sessions provide insights into team dynamics and interprofessional relationships. Simulations and debriefing sessions can promote understanding, respect, and familiarity of team members' roles; recognition of key characteristics of high functioning leaders and teams; and discovery of conflict mitigating strategies for future interdisciplinary team improvement. Simulation sessions allow implementation of quality improvement measures and communication and leadership strategy practice in a safe, collaborative learning environment. The lessons learned from these sessions can encourage participants to reexamine how they interact and function as a team within the real-life trauma bay.

A Guide for Medical Educators: How to Design and Implement In Situ Simulation in an Academic Emergency Department to Support Interprofessional Education.

In situ simulation (ISS) put simulation training directly into the clinical practice environment. Although ISS creates opportunities to identify latent system threats, understand culture, and improve team dynamics, there are limited resources for medical educators to guide the development and implementation of ISS at academic (or community-based) emergency departments (EDs). We describe the implementation of ISS in a high-volume urban ED to help educators understand the requirements and limitations of successful program design. During an academic year, 66 individual learners participated in at least one of our 22 training sessions, a cohort that included 37 nurses, 17 physicians, eight physician assistants, and four allied health professionals. Feedback from these participants and case facilitators informed our iterative process of review and development of program guidelines and best practices. We share these key technical points and the themes we found to be essential to the successful implementation of an ISS program: consideration of session timing, participant buy-in, flexibility, and threats to professional identity. Overall, our report demonstrates the feasibility of implementing an ISS program in a high-volume urban ED and provides medical educators with a guide for creating an ISS program for interprofessional education.